Páginas vistas

jueves, 12 de junio de 2014

Rechazados por su look

No pocas veces las personas que no cumplen los requisitos de cierto aspecto personal impuesto por un mercado discriminatorio y enfermizo se ven rechazadas en los procesos de selección para un puesto de trabajo. Hombres y mujeres con sobrepeso, gordos/as son mal vistos. Fíjense en Yahoo y sus indecentes tratamientos del look femenino. Aquí va un extracto en inglés que pueden seguir en "The Guardian". Si han sido discriminados por pesar más que una modelo de pasarela, tener tripa o el denominado sobrepeso y les apetece contarlo, codondesastre lo publicará. Siempre de forma respetuosa y correcta. Cañeros pero decentes.

gordos : Fat Man feliz con sonrisa grande

Is obesity a disability or a choice gone awry? Danish child-minder Karsten Kaltoft was fired from his job because he was too overweight – at 25 stone – to tie a child's shoe laces. He is suing for discrimination. His case will he heard by the European court of justice in Luxembourg today. If Kaltoft is successful, the ruling will be binding throughout the EU. Employers will be required to treat overweight employees as disabled and therefore requiring special treatment – priority parking, for instance, and sturdy furniture – and they will be unable to fire them for being overweight. (I will not say "fat". Eating disorder professionals do not say fat because they know that compulsive eating and anorexia are twins, and dependent on self-hatred to thrive.) The right will scream that this is special treatment for "fat" people – they probably will say "fat", not being eating disorder professionals, or even particularly kindly – who choose to be "fat" even if now they regret it, and have to be cut from their homes by emergency workers. On your bike, and so forth. Eat some kale".

Ah, by de way: hace ya casi una semana que Yahoo no insulta a Letizia Ortiz Rocasolano. O se han acojonado ellos o les dieron un buen toque real. Que se j..... Yahoo. Que respete a todas las personas.
Foto libertadigital


Mi Buenos Aires en Roses (CAT)

Vista de Roses desde el Puig Rom


 El asunto  es cómo disfrutar de un sabroso condumio (comer, vamos) en Roses, Girona, Costa Brava, (CAT), Alt Empordá, sin desembolsar una fortuna. Roses es un enclave cultural y playero archi-mega- turístico, que en verano es un Mare Magnum de gente como langostinos cocidos. 
Parte del personal nativo presume de alta gastronomía (síndrome muy agudo de :"somos como el famoso Bulli"). Y de acuerdo a dicha quimera clavan a los visitantes que se dejan. Es un decir. Vamos.



Quiero recomendar una "rostisseria" (asador) de Roses llamada "Buenos Aires" , cita en la calle Doctor Arruga 26, detrás del Mercado.

"Buenos Aires" es un negocio familiar de gran calidad. Levantado por una familia argentino, catalana, vasca, española, italiana y lo que se tercie. Están desde primera hora al pie de los fogones. Ofrecen deliciosas empanadas. El menú para llevar es una tentación. También se puede optar por comer en el local. 

Pueden encargar sus pedidos al 972 151 080. El pollo asado sabe a gloria. Y que conste que no llevo comisión. Chao Óscar. 

Ah, los pedidos se pagan al contado, no se fía ni al Pelusa, y las tarjetas se aceptan exclusivamente cuando el monto deje beneficios. Que aquí no hay trampa.

                                       "Fundación Mítica de Buenos Aires", del viejito Borges, claro que se cumplió la maldición de nunca reconocerle el Nobel por aquel tributo que hizo a un dictador, como si todos los otros fueran libres de pecados políticos.

¿Y fue por este río de sueñera y de barro
que las proas vinieron a fundarme la patria?
Irían a los tumbos los barquitos pintados
entre los camalotes de la corriente zaina.
Pensando bien la cosa, supondremos que el río
era azulejo entonces como oriundo del cielo
con su estrellita roja para marcar el sitio
en que ayunó Juan Díaz y los indios comieron.
Lo cierto es que mil hombres y otros mil arribaron
por un mar que tenía cinco lunas de anchura
y aún estaba poblado de sirenas y endriagos
y de piedras imanes que enloquecen la brújula.
Prendieron unos ranchos trémulos en la costa,
durmieron extrañados. Dicen que en el Riachuelo,
pero son embelecos fraguados en la Boca.
Fue una manzana entera y en mi barrio: en Palermo.
Una manzana entera pero en mitá del campo
expuesta a las auroras y lluvias y suestadas.
La manzana pareja que persiste en mi barrio:
Guatemala, Serrano, Paraguay y Gurruchaga.
Un almacén rosado como revés de naipe
brilló y en la trastienda conversaron un truco;
el almacén rosado floreció en un compadre,
ya patrón de la esquina, ya resentido y duro.
El primer organito salvaba el horizonte
con su achacoso porte, su habanera y su gringo.
El corralón seguro ya opinaba Yrigoyen,
algún piano mandaba tangos de Saborido.
Una cigarrería sahumó como una rosa
el desierto. La tarde se había ahondado en ayeres,
los hombres compartieron un pasado ilusorio.
Sólo faltó una cosa: la vereda de enfrente.
A mí se me hace cuento que empezó Buenos Aires:
La juzgo tan eterna como el agua y como el aire.

miércoles, 11 de junio de 2014

Putin "like Hitler" Prince Charles dixit


Putin ‘like Hitler’? How did Prince Charles get it so wrong?

Global Research, June 10, 2014

The Guardian
Far from being ‘like Hitler’ as Prince Charles accuses, Putin is sober, cautious, defensive, a stickler for international law, determined to modernise Russia, and anxious to avoid military confrontation. Israel Shamir sees through the NATO propaganda …

Putin me mola montón.
Putin’s choice is not an easy one. As Russia procrastinates, as the US doubles the risks, the world draws nearer to the nuclear abyss. Who will chicken out? 

It is not much fun to be in Kiev these days. The revolutionary excitement is over, and hopes for new faces, the end of corruption and economic improvement have withered.
The Maidan street revolt and the subsequent coup just reshuffled marked d
The new acting President has been an acting prime minister, and a KGB (called ‘SBU’ in Ukrainian) supremo.
The new acting prime minister has been a foreign minister. The oligarch most likely to be ‘elected’ President in a few days has been a foreign minister, the head of the state bank, and personal treasurer of two coups, in 2004 (installing Yushchenko) and in 2014 (installing himself).
His main competitor, Mme Timoshenko, served as a prime minister for years, until electoral defeat in 2010.
The new rulers are the ones that ruined Ukraine
These people had brought Ukraine to its present abject state. In 1991, the Ukraine was richer than Russia, today it is three times poorer because of these people’s mismanagement and theft.
Now they plan an old trick: to take loans in Ukraine’s name, pocket the cash and leave the country indebted. They sell state assets to Western companies and ask for NATO to come in and protect the investment.
They play a hard game, brass knuckles and all. The Black Guard, a new SS-like armed force of the neo-nazi Right Sector, prowls the land. They arrest or kill dissidents, activists, journalists.
Hundreds of American soldiers, belonging to the ‘private’ company Academi (formerly Blackwater) are spread out in Novorossia, the pro-Russian provinces in the East and South-East.
IMF-dictated reforms slashed pensions by half and doubled the housing rents. In the market, US Army rations took the place of local food.
Kiev – even the pretence of democracy has gone
The new Kiev regime had dropped the last pretence of democracy by expelling the Communists from the parliament. This should endear them to the US even more.
Expel Communists, apply for NATO, condemn Russia, arrange a gay parade and you may do anything at all, even fry dozens of citizens alive. And so they did.
The harshest repressions were unleashed on industrial Novorossia, as its working class loathes the whole lot of oligarchs and ultra-nationalists.
After the blazing inferno of Odessa and a wanton shooting on the streets of Melitopol the two rebellious provinces of Donetsk and Lugansk took up arms and declared their independence from the Kiev regime. They came under fire, but did not surrender.
The other six Russian-speaking industrial provinces of Novorossia were quickly cowed. Dnepropetrovsk and Odessa were terrorised by personal army of Mr Kolomoysky. Kharkov was misled by its tricky governor.
Russia did not interfere and did not support the rebellion, to the great distress of Russian nationalists in Ukraine and Russia who mutter about “betrayal”. So much for the warlike rhetoric of McCain and Brzezinski.
An exasperating respect for international law
Putin’s respect for others’ sovereignty is exasperating. I understand this sounds like a joke, – you hear so much about Putin as a “new Hitler” – most recently in unguarded comments from Prince Charles on his Canadian tour.
As a matter of fact, Putin had legal training before joining the Secret Service. He is a stickler for international law. His Russia has interfered with other states much less than France or England, let alone the US.
I asked his senior adviser, Mr Alexei Pushkov, why Russia did not try to influence Ukrainian minds while Kiev buzzed with American and European officials. “We think it is wrong to interfere”, he replied like a good Sunday schoolboy.
It is rather likely Putin’s advisors misjudged public sentiment. The majority of Novorossia’s population does not like the new Kiev regime, but being politically passive and conservative, will submit to its rule”, they estimated.

Codón= 3 nucleótidos

¿Pero qué demonios es un codón? ¿Y qué es codón desastre?: un blog cañero y chulo. No recomendado para gili-ciber-pijos/as o menores de 16, sin autorización paterna/materna. Codón desastre apoya al "Jueves", que sale los miércoles. 
No publica ni disemina imágenes que ofendan la dignidad de las personas. Especialmente aquellas que degradan niñas/os, mujeres, y/o personas en riesgo de exclusión social. Codón desastre comunica a la policía correspondiente las páginas y/o campañas de pedófilos, proxenetas y delincuentes on line.
Combatir delitos raros en la red mola un montón. Así que hala, gente, aquí va un buen tocho de genética molecular. No duele. O se duermen.

Definición: Un codón es un triplete de nucleótidos (nucleótidos :adenina-guanina-timina-citocina). 

Es la unidad básica de información en el proceso de traducción. 

Cada codón codifica un aminoácido. (Las proteínas son cadenas de amininoácidos)

Esta correspondencia es la base del código genético.

El código genético permite traducir la secuencia de ARNm a la secuencia de aminoácidos que constituyen una proteína.

Un codón es un triplete de nucleótidos


Un codón porta la información para pasar la secuencia de nucleótidos del ARNm a la secuencia de aminoácidos de la proteína en el proceso de traducción. 

Cada codón codifica un aminoácido. 

Hay 64 codones diferentes por combinación de los 4 nucleótidos en cada una de las 3 posiciones del triplete.

 Pero sólo 61 codifican aminoácidos. Los 3 restantes son codones de terminación de la traducción, conocidos como codones de parada o codones stop llamados ocre (UAA), ámbar (UAG) y ópalo (UGA). 

Hay un codón de inicio de la traducción, el AUG, que codifica la metionina. 

Salvo la metionina y el triptófano que están codificados por un único codón, los aminoácidos pueden estar codificados 

por 2, 3, 4 ó 6 codones diferentes. Los codones que codifican un mismo aminoácido muchas veces tienen los dos primeros nucleótidos iguales, cambiando sólo el tercero.










Aquí con el tablerito se pueden montar contraseñas u otras tonterías como la consigna de "fiat lux":

His
Thr
Asp
y ATAC que mete caña.


Obama: A very funny Peace Nobel Price



From Global Research Article: codon desastre about strategic bombers to Europe.



“This deployment of strategic bombers provides an invaluable opportunity to strengthen and improve interoperability with our allies and partners.”
– Admiral Cecil Haney, commander, US Strategic Command on the deployment of B-2 stealth bombers to Europe.
“Against stupidity, no amount of planning will prevail.”
- Carl von Clausewitz
Less than 24 hours after Ukraine’s new president Petro Poroshenko announced his determination to retake Crimea from Russia, US Admiral Cecil Haney confirmed that the US Air Force had deployed two B-2 stealth bombers to Europe to conduct military exercises. The addition of the multipurpose B-2, which is capable of delivering nuclear weapons, is intended to send a message to Moscow that the United States is prepared to provide backup for Ukraine’s fledgling government and to protect its interests in Central Asia. News of the deployment was reported in the Russian media, but was excluded by all the western news outlets.
The B-2 announcement was preceded by an inflammatory speech by Poroshenko at the presidential “swearing in” ceremony in Kiev. In what some analysts have called a “declaration of war”, Poroshenko promised to wrest control of Crimea from Russia which annexed the region just months earlier following a public referendum that showed 90 percent support for the measure. Here’s part of what Poroshenko said:
“The issue of territorial integrity of Ukraine is not subject to discussion…I have just sworn ‘with all my deeds to protect the sovereignty and independence of Ukraine,’ and I will always be faithful to this sacred promise…
“Russia occupied Crimea, which was, is and will be Ukrainian soil…Yesterday, in the course of the meeting in Normandy, I told this to President Putin: Crimea is Ukraine soil. Period. There can be no compromise on the issues of Crimea, European choice and state structure…” (New York Times)
On Thursday, the day before Poroshenko was sworn in, “President Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron set a deadline for Russia to comply with its demands or face harsher economic sanctions that would be imposed by members of the G-7. Once again, the threat of new sanctions was largely ignored by the western media but was reported in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. Here’s an excerpt from the article:
“To avoid even harsher sanctions.. Putin must meet three conditions: Recognize Petro Poroshenko’s election as the new leader in Kiev; stop arms from crossing the border; and cease support for pro-Russian separatist groups concentrated in eastern Ukraine.
“If these things don’t happen, then sectoral sanctions will follow…”
Obama said the G-7 leaders unanimously agree with the steps Cameron outlined.” (Haaretz)
The United States is ratcheting up the pressure in order to widen the conflict and force Russian president Vladimir Putin to meet their demands. It’s clear that the threat of sanctions, Poroshenko’s belligerent rhetoric, and the steady buildup of military assets and troops in the region, that Obama and Co. still think they can draw Putin into the conflict and make him look like a dangerous aggressor who can’t be trusted by his EU partners. Fortunately, Putin has not fallen into the trap. He’s resisted the temptation to send in the tanks to put an end to the violence in Donetsk, Lugansk and Slavyansk. This has undermined Washington’s plan to deploy NATO to Russia’s western border, assert control over the “bridgehead” between Europe and Asia, and stop the further economic integration between Russia and the EU. So far, Putin has out-witted his adversaries at every turn, but there are still big challenges ahead, particularly the new threats from Poroshenko.
If Poroshenko is determined to take Crimea back from Moscow, then there’s going to be a war. But there are indications that he is more pragmatic than his speeches would suggest. In a private meeting with Putin at the D-Day ceremonies in France, the Ukrainian president said he had a plan to “immediately stop the bloodshed”
Here’s how Putin summarized his meeting with Poroshenko:
“Poroshenko has a plan in this respect; it is up to him to say what kind of plan it is… I cannot say for sure how these plans will be implemented, but I liked the general attitude, it seemed right to me, so, if it happens this way, there will be conditions to develop our relations, in other areas, including economy.
“It’s important to stop the punitive actions in the southeast without a delay. That’s the only way to create conditions for the start of a real process of negotiations with the 

The dirty myth of a "good" World War II

The Myth of the Good War: America in World War II

60 Years Ago, February 13-14, 1945: Why was Dresden Destroyed

 138 
  17  36 
 
  2878
The Myth of the Good War: America in World War II
In the night of February 13-14, 1945, the ancient and beautiful capital of Saxony, Dresden, was attacked three times, twice by the RAF and once by the USAAF, the United States Army Air Force, in an operation involving well over 1,000 bombers. The consequences were catastrophic, as the historical city centre was incinerated and between 25,000 and 40,000 people lost their lives.[1]
Dresden was not an important industrial or military centre and therefore not a target worthy of the considerable and unusual common American and British effort involved in the raid. The city was not attacked as retribution for earlier German bombing raids on cities such as Rotterdam and Coventry, either. In revenge for the destruction of these cities, bombed ruthlessly by the Luftwaffe in 1940, Berlin, Hamburg, Cologne and countless other German towns big and small had already paid dearly in 1942, 1943, and 1944.
Furthermore, by the beginning of 1945, the Allied commanders knew perfectly well that even the most ferocious bombing raid would not succeed in “terrorizing [the Germans] into submission,”[2] so that it is not realistic to ascribe this motive to the planners of the operation. The bombing of Dresden, then, seems to have been a senseless slaughter, and looms as an even more terrible undertaking than the atomic obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which is at least supposed to have led to the capitulation of Japan.
In recent times, however, the bombing of countries and of cities has almost become an everyday occurrence, rationalized not only by our political leaders but also presented by our media as an effective military undertaking and as a perfectly legitimate means to achieve supposedly worthwhile objectives. In this context, even the terrible attack on Dresden has recently been rehabilitated by a British historian, Frederick Taylor, who argues that the huge destruction wreaked on the Saxon city was not intended by the planners of the attack, but was the unexpected result of a combination of unfortunate circumstances, including perfect weather conditions and hopelessly inadequate German air defenses.[3]

codondesastre.blogpot.com  recomienda el presente artículo. codondesastre endorses Global Research. Dr. A. M. Quevedo Goicoechea

martes, 10 de junio de 2014

Endesa: flagela a los ciudadanos.

El breve reportaje que viene a continuación recoje el aspecto de la entrada de la empresa sub contratada a la que la multinacional Endesa asigna la atención de los consumidores en Figueres. Antes de la hora de apertura de dicho establecimiento y después de un festivo, ya había un crecido número de personas, mayores acalorados por cierto, en espera de la bendita hora de intentar resolver entuertos. El espectáculo me recordó las colas ante los comedores de beneficencia. Van a primera hora a sabiendas de la lentitud y desidia que allí reina. Y aquí lo firmo como periodista. (Versión corregida por fallos del sistema y la redactora cabreada).

Alina Quevedo Goicoechea (Figueres)




Versión cool Endesa

"Experiencia de la cual usted se puede beneficiar.

¿Tiene empresa y quiere que sus clientes le puedan localizar tanto día y noche como durante los fines de semana?
¡Pues TeleservicePro le ofrece la solución!
TeleservicePro es un servicio de contestador telefónico que se inició por la necesidad del mundo empresarial de ser constantemente localizable.


Localizable 24 horas al día
Muchos clientes satisfechos
Operadores de alto nivel de formación profesional

Le garantizamos que nuestros operadores profesionales contestan a una llamada dentro de los 15 segundos.

Nuestro servicio se dirige a la rapidez y la rentabilidad.
Accesibilidad óptima en cada momento del día.

Lies about Normandy Landing

The Normandy Landing and World War II: The Lies Grow More Audacious

Global Research, June 07, 2014


If there were any doubts that Western “leaders” live in a fantasy make-believe world constructed out of their own lies, the G-7 meeting and 70th anniversary celebration of the Normandy landing dispelled the doubts.
The howlers issuing from these occasions are enough to split your sides. Obama and his lap dog Cameron described the Normandy landing on June 6, 1944, as “the greatest liberation force that the world has ever known” and took all the credit for the US and Britain for the defeat of Hitler. No mention was made of the Soviet Union and the Red Army, which for three years prior to the Normandy landing had been fighting and defeating the Wehrmacht.
Author Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
The Germans lost World War II at the Battle of Stalingrad, which was fought from August 23, 1942 until February 2, 1943, when most of the remnants of the powerful German Sixth Army surrendered, including 22 generals.
Nineteen months previously the largest invasion force ever assembled on planet earth invaded Russia across a one thousand mile front. Three million crack German troops; 7,500 artillery units, 19 panzer divisions with 3,000 tanks, and 2,500 aircraft rolled across Russia for 14 months.
By June 1944, three years later, very little of this force was left. The Red Army had chewed it up. When the so-called “allies” (a term which apparently excludes Russia) landed in France, there was little to resist them. The best forces remaining to Hitler were on the Russian front, which collapsed day by day as the Red Army approached Berlin.
The Red Army won the war with Germany. The Americans and the British showed up after the Wehrmacht was exhausted and in tatters and could offer little resistance. Joseph Stalin believed that Washington and London stayed out of the war until the last minute and left Russia with the burden of defeating Germany.
Hollywood and popular writers have, of course, buried the facts. Americans have all sorts of movies, such as “A Bridge Too Far,” that portray insignificant events, however heroic, as turning points in the war. Nevertheless, the facts are clear. The war was won on the Eastern front by Russia. Hollywood’s movies are fun, but they are nonsense.
Russia is again on the outs with “the world community,” because Obama’s plan to seize Ukraine and to evict Russia from its Black Sea base in Crimea has come a cropper. Crimea has been a part of Russia for as long as the US has existed. Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, stuck Crimea into the Ukrainian Socialist Republic in 1954 when Russia and Ukraine were part of the same country.
When the Washington-imposed stooge government in Kiev recently declared that it was abolishing the use of the Russian language and arresting Ukrainians who had dual Russian citizenship and began tearing down Russian war memorials consecrated to the liberation of Ukraine from the Nazis, the people in Crimea used the ballot box to disassociate from Washington’s stooge government in Kiev, first voting their independence and then voting for reunification with their mother country.
Washington, and the other G-7 countries following Washington’s orders, described this
Crimean act of self-determination, which is exactly comparable to the act of self-determination declared by Britain’s American colonies, to be a case of “Russian invasion and annexation.” Similar efforts to disassociate from Kiev are underway in other former Russian territories that today comprise eastern and southern Ukraine.
Washington has equated self-determination in eastern and southern Ukraine with “terrorism” and has encouraged its stooge in Kiev to use military violence against protesting civilians. The reason for branding separatists “terrorists” is to make it OK to kill them.
It is extraordinary to any learned person that the President of the United States and the titular heads of state of the Western European countries would publicly declare such blatant lies to the world. The world has historians. The world has peoples whose knowledge vastly exceeds that of the “mainstream media,” a.k.a., the Ministry of Propaganda, or, as Gerald Celente brands them, “the presstitutes.” Whatever name we use, the Western media is a collection of well paid whores.They lie for money, dinner party invitations, and speaking invitations with large honorariums and book contracts with large advances.
I know. They tried to recruit me.
Notice how narrowly Washington defines “the world community.” The “world community” consists of the Group of 7. That’s it. Seven countries make up the “world community.” The “world community” consists of six white countries and Washington’s puppet state of Japan. The “world community” is the US, Canada, Britain, Germany, France, Italy, and Japan. The other 190 countries are not part of Washington’s “world community.” In the neocon doctrine, they are not even part of humanity.
The “world community” doesn’t have the population of single excluded countries, such as China or India. I haven’t done the calculation, but probably the land mass of Russia itself exceeds the land mass of the “world community.”
So, what is this “world community?”
The “world community” is the assemblage of US vassal states. Britain, France, and Germany were important on the 20th century scene. Their histories are studied in universities. The populations had a decent standard of living, although not for all citizens. Their past is the reason for their present importance.
In effect, these countries were propelled forward by history, or by the history important to the West. Japan, being an appendage of Washington, has tried to become “western.” It is extraordinary how such a proud, war-like people became nothing.
As I have finally stopped laughing at the presumed non-role of Russia in the defeat of Hitler, let’s return to the G-7 meeting. The Big Happening of this meeting was Russia’s exclusion and the shrinkage of the G-8 to the G-7.
This was the first time in 17 years that Russia was not allowed to participate in the meeting of which Russia is a member. Why?
Russia is being punished. Russia is being isolated from the 7 countries that the White House Fool thinks constitute “the world community.”
Obama is angry that his National Security Council and the morons he appointed to the State Department and UN were so poorly educated that they did not know that much of the Ukraine consists of former Russian provinces inhabited by Russians. These ignorant Obama-appointed morons thought that they could grab Crimea, evict Russia, and leave Russia without access to the Mediterranean, thus unable to hold on to its naval base in Tartus, Syria, the easier for Washington to invade Syria.
Crimea has been part of Russia since Russia completed the reconquest from the Tartars. I remember the Tarter, or Tater, ethnics from my visit to Tamerlane the Great’s (Timur as he was also known) tomb in Samarkand 53 years ago. Today Tamerlane’s city is refurbished as a tourist site. 53 years ago it was a desolate place in ruins, overgrown with trees growing out of the tops of the minarets.
As Obama’s plan to seize Ukraine failed, like every one of his other plans has failed, Washington’s spokesmen for the vested private interests have seized on the opportunity to demonize Putin and Russia and to restart the Cold War. Obama and his Group of 7 puppets or vassals used the occasion to threaten Russia with real sanctions, in place of the present propaganda sanctions that have no effect. According to Obama and his British lap dog, Putin must somehow prevent the Russian populations of eastern and southern Ukraine from protesting their subservience to a neo-fascist government in Kiev backed by Washington, or else.
Putin is supposed to embrace the Oligarch, a former minister of the government that Washington overthrew, put in office by a fake vote in which turnout was a small percent of the population. Putin is supposed to kiss this corrupt Oligarch on both cheeks, pay Ukraine’s natural gas bills and forgive its debts. In addition, Russia is supposed to repudiate the Crimean people, evict them from their re-unity with Russia and hand them over to the neo-Nazi Right Sector to be eliminated as retribution for Russia’s victory over Nazi Germany, for whom some Western Ukrainians fought. In exchange, Washington and NATO will put anti-ballistic missile bases on Ukraine’s border with Russia in order to protect Europe from nonexistent Iranian nuclear ICBMs.
This is supposed to be a win-win deal for Russia.

lunes, 9 de junio de 2014

Kuba reina del voleibol



CIUDAD DE MÉXICO, 9 de junio.- La Selección Mexicana de voleibol resultó
arrasada por la poderosa Cuba, que ganó en tres sets, y se quedó como primer lugar del Grupo F, División III, de la Liga Mundial 2014. Ahora, los equipos viajarán a Túnez para disputar la segunda fase y buscar un lugar en el Final Four de la división, que se realizará en Turquía.
Kuba, Kuba Kuba............ACT, ATAC, CAT is with you........."The fiat lux army" on your side.

Colografía. Celia I. (2010) No copiar sin autorización.

Pyros sin testis


Cuando solía andar  por las Smoky, mi sueño húmedo era darme de cara con un oso. Y, claro, cumplir con lo que me había explicado una experta guarda forestal, con más de 20 años en un centro de información polivalente que podía convertirse en refugio. A lo más que llegué, y no estuvo mal, fue a observar y reconocer una cagada fresca. Cuando regresé al enclave protegido llovía. La policía forestal me confirmó que aquello que había visto eran heces frescas de un/a adulto/a. Ya se cerraba el refugio con la ceremonia de recoger la bandera (arriar creo) en la que participamos.
 Una gozadas la mierda de oso.










"An elderly brown bear in the Pyrenees is facing castration or segregation amid fears that his sexual dominance is threatening the species' survival in the region by limiting genetic diversity.
Pyros, one of the oldest of the 30 or so bears who roam the mountains between France and Spain, is the father, grandfather or great-grandfather of nearly all of the cubs born in the Pyrenees over the past two decades. There are four other males in the colony – only one of them is not related to Pyros – and none of them have fathered any offspring.
Spanish officials said they were being forced to decide between castration or segregation for Pyros after the recent birth of a cub who was both his daughter and grand-daughter. (Con datos de A. Kassam para "The Guardian")
"If he keeps up this sexual vigour and dominant attitude for a few more ........(The Guardian)

domingo, 8 de junio de 2014

Behind Bin Laden Killing (a strange story for dummies)

Navy SEAL Commander behind Bin Laden Killing: Keystone XL Vulnerable to Terrorism

Global Research, June 06, 2014

Dave Cooper, Command Master Chief SEAL (Retired) for the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU), has authored a threat assessment concluding TransCanada‘s Keystone XL tar sands pipeline is potentially at-risk of a terrorism attack.
In the report, Cooper concluded operational security vulnerabilities for the pipeline have been overlooked by the U.S. government. Cooper — most famous for overseeing the Abbottabad, Pakistan Osama Bin Laden raid as the commander of Navy SEAL Team Six — wrote the report as a consultant for billionaire Tom Steyer‘s advocacy group NextGen Climate Action.
“The very nature of Keystone XL’s newsworthiness, should it ever be built, increases its attractiveness as a target to terrorists: Keystone XL, aside from being a ‘soft’ target just like any other pipeline, has a built-in emotional impact that can’t be denied or wished away,” he wrote in the report’s introduction.
“That simple fact, a newsworthy proposal that engenders strong passions, should clue in pipeline owners and government officials to the very real possibility of intentional attack.”
For the report, Cooper utilized a “red cell” methodology, parlance for U.S. special operations forces performing pre-mission reconnaissance, using open source data readily available to terrorists on the internet. In so doing, the special operations forces snuff out operational security (“OpSec” in military lingo) weaknesses, which they use as actionable intelligence in defense missions.
In the report, Cooper explained he “designed [the methodology this way] to showcase weaknesses in the current reality by exploiting the same information to which an outside terrorist group would have access.”
Cooper’s probe included a due diligence trip out to the Sand Hills region of Nebraska, where Phase Iof the Keystone Pipeline System is currently operational (the northern leg of Keystone XL is Phase IV). Going out into the field, Cooper came away shocked by his discoveries.
His findings raise a troubling question: have real Keystone XL terrorism threats been ignored, whilenon-violent activists have been labeled potential eco-terrorists? Cooper offered his take on this question to DeSmogBlog.
“No Sight” of Active Security Program
Cooper said he mapped out his entire Nebraska trip by using a maps of the Keystone Pipeline System he found online.
“In military parlance, the site visit at [redacted] was a ‘cold shot,’ done with no advance preparation or planning, using only information and intelligence gathered from publicly available sources,” wrote Cooper.

TransCanada Keystone Pipeline System; Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons
“[redacted] was selected because it has both a valve and pumping station for the operational Keystone 1, it is somewhat near Keystone XL’s route, and it is roughly similar to the proposed Keystone XL – with presumably the same level of security as the proposed pipeline.”
Once on the ground, Cooper found absolutely nothing indicating an active security program.
“I was able to freely approach, then stand at a Keystone 1 pump station for over 15 minutes snapping photos,” he wrote. “I was not approached, questioned or even noticed at any point.”
Cooper concluded that in a worst case scenario, a dozen terrorists could cause a seven million gallon spill by attacking the pipeline at three points. And that’s if TransCanada were to have perfect execution of shut-down protocol.
KXL and FBI/DHS Fusion Centers
In concluding his report, Cooper pays homage to domestic intelligence agencies for practicingpredictive policing.
“This assessment also cannot speak for the innumerable and valiant efforts of our intelligence agencies, those who strive daily to defeat terrorists ‘upstream’ before they can actually act on their designs,” wrote Cooper. “Their persistent actions in our defense could very well thwart any such pipeline attack during the terrorists’ observation, orientation and decision phases.”
DeSmogBlog has reported on these predictive policing efforts as it pertains to Keystone XL. And the results, put mildly, haven’t been pretty.
Documents obtained by Bold Nebraska and reported on here in June 2013 revealed TransCanada and the Nebraska-based Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) Fusion Center labeled non-violent activists as possible candidates for terrorism charges and other serious criminal charges.