 |
| Como es finde y ya he publicado bastantes asuntos muy tristes (van 15 muertes en las aguas fronterizas a España y Marruecos, "negros, pobres e indocumentados", que ha dicho un político español, "una flagrante violación de los derechos humanos", según Cayo Lara de IU, y algo que hay que estudiar mucho para evitarlo racionalmente, con recursos, acuerdos internacionales e implicación de la UE), pues eso. Aquí va algo que me ha gustado. Molan. Ni publicidad encubierta ni narices. Si lo fuera se los diría. Buen finde. |
sábado, 15 de febrero de 2014
Me molan mucho
Tania, "la guerrillera", regresa a Cuba
Pertenencias de Haydeé Tamara Bunke (revolucionaria argentino-alemana que participó en la guerrilla del Che en Bolivia) se entregaron al Instituto Cubano de Amistad con los Pueblos (ICAP) por el político alemán Hans Modrow, quien lo hizo en nombre de la organización alemana, "Cubasí".
Antes de morir, Nadia Bunke, de soltera Bider, alemana de origen polaco y judía, madre de Haydeé Tamara Bunke, dejó en manos de esa entidad ciertos objetos de su hija. Esta organización las ha donado al ICAP, organismo cubano en el que en los años sesenta colaboró Tamara Bunke, antes de integrarse al Ministerio de Interior cubano para recibir entrenamiento como combatiente y agente especializada en inteligencia y contra inteligencia.
Su uniforme de campaña, un block de notas, un cuaderno escolar, una placa de bronce, fotografías, cartas y otros documentos se encuentran entre las pertenencias de la joven revolucionaria donadas al ICAP.
Al acto asistió José Ramón Balaguer, jefe del Departamento de Relaciones Internacionales del Comité Central del Partido Comunista de Cuba.
Haydeé Tamara Bunke Bider está enterrada en Santa Clara, Cuba.
Haydeé Tamara Bunke Bider está enterrada en Santa Clara, Cuba.
"Women as freakish androgynes":Mary Beard
"Women who claim a public voice "get treated as freakish androgynes" with women under-represented in national politics and relatively "mute" in the public sphere, the classicist and author Mary Beard has said.España, los países latinos, son muy machistas. La paridad entre géneros está lejana. Y vaya un botón de muestra: el hermoso y florido castellano se encuentra plagado de formas y usos ofensivos respecto a las féminas. Si usted se refiere a un hombre público puede pensar en Rajoy, presidente del Gobierno español. Si alude a una mujer pública resulta un pendón verbenero, es decir, una mujer "que se enrolla con cualquiera". Si se fijan en los portales hispanos, a las mujeres se nos trata de "mami", "titi", "ricura", "reina", etc. Yahoo, ese emporio cultural universal, exhibe cuerpos femeninos en términos que en realidad son culos, tetas, escotes, piernas vertiginosas, cambios de look, grasa corporal, carne. Ridiculiza sistemáticamente a muchas mujeres que piensan. Odian a otras como a la señora Letizia Ortiz Rocasolano, contra la que, sin motivos claros, desarrolla una verdadera manía. En Yahoo no se permiten desnudos artísticos, ni fotos de madres dando de mamar a sus hijos, pero se usa el pecho de la mujer como objeto de observación masculina.
Desgraciadamente los medios de comunicación no contribuyen a mejorar la presencia femenina y su representación. Recuerdo que "ABC", que es periódico español de mucha solera, publicó en primera una foto de Merkel en bañador. No se atreven a hacerlo digamos, con otras personalidades.
"Las mujeres que quieren hacer escuchar su voz son tratadas como marimachos raros" (traducción libre y castiza de freakish androgynes), afirma la catedrática y académica británica Mary Beard.
Beard ha sido víctima de acoso en la red por parte elementos maliciosos.
Highlighting the lack of the voice of expertise from women outside "the traditional spheres of women's sexual interests", the Cambridge academic Mary Beard has said: "To put it another way, for a female MP to be minister of women or of education or health is a very different thing from being chancellor of the exchequer.
"Across the board we still seem resistant of female encroachment into traditional male territory, whether that is the abuse hurled at Jacqui Oatley for having the nerve to stray from the netball court for becoming the first woman commentator on Match of the Day, or what can get meted out to women who appear on Question Time."
(Con información de Debra Hurford)
viernes, 14 de febrero de 2014
The Threat of World War III
Absurdities and Atrocities: The Threat of World War III
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, February 13, 2014
Ni recomiendo ni rechazo el texto del profesor Michel Chossudovsky: me proporcionó información. Me hizo pensar, que ya es algo. El panorama en Irán parece haber cambiado. Pero la inestabilidad de otras regiones del planeta es real. El culto al uso de la fuerza tampoco es un artefacto teórico de un estudioso nada dado a la fantasía catastrofista.
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/absurdities-and-atrocities-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/25540
Throughout the history of mankind there have been murderers and tyrants; and while it may seem momentarily that they have the upper hand, they have always fallen. (Mahatma Gandhi)
The United States has discarded pretensions to international legality and decency, and embarked on a course of raw imperialism run amok. (William Rockler, Nuremberg Tribunal prosecutor)
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. (François-Marie Arouet – Voltaire, 1694-1778)
Look inside “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War“, the E-Book by Michel Chossudovsky:
The US and its NATO allies are preparing to launch a nuclear war directed against both Iran and North Korea with devastating consequences. This military adventure in the real sense of the word threatens the future of humanity. While one can conceptualize the loss of life and destruction resulting from present-day wars including Iraq and Afghanistan, it is impossible to fully comprehend the devastation which might result from a Third World War, using “new technologies” and advanced weapons, until it occurs and becomes a reality. The international community has endorsed nuclear war in the name of world peace. “Making the world safer” is the justification for launching a military operation which could potentially result in a nuclear holocaust.
But nuclear holocausts are not front page news! In the words of Mordechai Vanunu:
“The Israeli government is preparing to use nuclear weapons in its next war with the Islamic world. Here where I live, people often talk of the Holocaust. But each and every nuclear bomb is a Holocaust in itself. It can kill, devastate cities, destroy entire peoples.”[1]
Realities are turned upside down. In a twisted logic, a “humanitarian war” using tactical nuclear weapons, which according to “expert scientific opinion” are “harmless to the surrounding civilian population” is upheld as a means to protecting the Western world from a nuclear attack.
The Cult of Killing and Destruction
The global killing machine is also sustained by an imbedded cult of killing and destruction which pervades Hollywood movies, not to mention the primetime war and crime TV series on network television. This cult of killing is endorsed by the CIA and the Pentagon which also support (finance) Hollywood productions as an instrument of war propaganda:
“Ex-CIA agent Bob Baer told us, “There’s a symbiosis between the CIA and Hollywood” and revealed that former CIA director George Tenet is currently, “out in Hollywood, talking to studios.””[2]
The killing machine is deployed at a global level, within the framework of the unified combat command structure. It is routinely upheld by the institutions of government, the corporate media, the mandarins and intellectuals of the New World Order in Washington’s think tanks and strategic studies research institutes, as an unquestioned instrument of peace and global prosperity.
A culture of killing and violence has become imbedded in human consciousness. War is broadly accepted as part of a societal process: the Homeland needs to be “defended” and protected. “Legitimized violence” and extrajudicial killings directed against “terrorists” are upheld in western democracies, as necessary instruments of national security. A “huma – nitarian war” is upheld by the so-called international community. It is not condemned as a criminal act. Its main architects are rewarded for their contributions to world peace.
America’s Mini-nukes
With regard to Iran, what is unfolding is the outright legitimization of war in the name of an illusive notion of global security. America’s mininukes, with an explosive capacity of up to six times a Hiroshima bomb, are upheld as a humanitarian bomb, whereas Iran’s nonexistent nuclear weapons are branded as an indisputable threat to global security.
When a US-sponsored nuclear war becomes an “instrument of peace”, condoned and accepted by the world’s institutions and the highest authority, including the United Nations, there is no turning back: human society has indelibly been precipitated headlong onto the path of self-destruction.
We are at a dangerous crossroads: the rules and guidelines governing the use of nuclear weapons have been “liberalized” (i.e. “deregulated” in relation to those prevailing during the Cold War era). The new doctrine states that Command, Control and Coordination (CCC) regarding the use of nuclear weapons should be “flexible”, allowing geographic combat commanders to decide if and when to use nuclear weapons:
“Geographic combat commanders would be in charge of Theater Nuclear Operations (TNO), with a mandate not only to implement but also to formulate command decisions pertaining to nuclear weapons.”[3]
We have reached a critical turning point in our history. It is absolutely essential that people across the land, nationally and internationally, understand the gravity of the present situation and act forcefully against their governments to reverse the tide of war.
The details of ongoing war preparations in relation to Iran and North Korea have been withheld from the public eye and the media is involved in acts of camouflage. The devastating impacts of a nuclear war are either trivialized or not mentioned. Instead, fake “crises” – e.g. a worldwide flu pandemic, a “false flag” nuclear attack by “Islamic terro rists” – are fabricated by the media, the governments, the intelligence apparatus and the Washington think tanks. While the real danger of nuclear war is barely acknowledged, these fake crises are invariably front page news.
A Third World War is no longer a hypothetical scenario. Already in 2007, President Bush hinted in no uncertain terms that if Iran did not comply with US demands, the US-NATO military might “reluctantly” be forced into in a World War III situation:
“We got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel. So I’ve told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon. I take the threat of Iran with a nuclear weapon very seriously...” (George W. Bush, 17 October 2007)
Notes
1. See interview with Mordechai Vanunu, Glob al Research, December 2005, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060102&articleId=1703.
2. Matthew Alford and Robbie Graham, “Lights, Camera, Covert Action: The Deep Politics of Hollywood”, Global Research, January 31, 2009, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11921.
3. Joint Chiefs of Staff, “Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations”, Joint Publication 3-12, Washington DC, March 2005, http://zfacts.com/metaPage/lib/zFacts_2005_03_15_Joint_Nuclear_Operations.pdf.
Order your pdf of this important book from Global Research here
E-Book Series No. 1.0
Global Research Publishers
Montreal, 2011. ISBN 978-0-9737147-3-9
76 pages (8.5×11)
Tables, color photographs, maps, text boxes.
Active hyperlinks to major references in the text, hyperlinked footnotes.
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, February 13, 2014
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/absurdities-and-atrocities-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/25540
Throughout the history of mankind there have been murderers and tyrants; and while it may seem momentarily that they have the upper hand, they have always fallen. (Mahatma Gandhi)
The United States has discarded pretensions to international legality and decency, and embarked on a course of raw imperialism run amok. (William Rockler, Nuremberg Tribunal prosecutor)
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. (François-Marie Arouet – Voltaire, 1694-1778)
Look inside “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War“, the E-Book by Michel Chossudovsky:
The US and its NATO allies are preparing to launch a nuclear war directed against both Iran and North Korea with devastating consequences. This military adventure in the real sense of the word threatens the future of humanity. While one can conceptualize the loss of life and destruction resulting from present-day wars including Iraq and Afghanistan, it is impossible to fully comprehend the devastation which might result from a Third World War, using “new technologies” and advanced weapons, until it occurs and becomes a reality. The international community has endorsed nuclear war in the name of world peace. “Making the world safer” is the justification for launching a military operation which could potentially result in a nuclear holocaust.
But nuclear holocausts are not front page news! In the words of Mordechai Vanunu:
“The Israeli government is preparing to use nuclear weapons in its next war with the Islamic world. Here where I live, people often talk of the Holocaust. But each and every nuclear bomb is a Holocaust in itself. It can kill, devastate cities, destroy entire peoples.”[1]
Realities are turned upside down. In a twisted logic, a “humanitarian war” using tactical nuclear weapons, which according to “expert scientific opinion” are “harmless to the surrounding civilian population” is upheld as a means to protecting the Western world from a nuclear attack.
The Cult of Killing and Destruction
The global killing machine is also sustained by an imbedded cult of killing and destruction which pervades Hollywood movies, not to mention the primetime war and crime TV series on network television. This cult of killing is endorsed by the CIA and the Pentagon which also support (finance) Hollywood productions as an instrument of war propaganda:
“Ex-CIA agent Bob Baer told us, “There’s a symbiosis between the CIA and Hollywood” and revealed that former CIA director George Tenet is currently, “out in Hollywood, talking to studios.””[2]
The killing machine is deployed at a global level, within the framework of the unified combat command structure. It is routinely upheld by the institutions of government, the corporate media, the mandarins and intellectuals of the New World Order in Washington’s think tanks and strategic studies research institutes, as an unquestioned instrument of peace and global prosperity.
A culture of killing and violence has become imbedded in human consciousness. War is broadly accepted as part of a societal process: the Homeland needs to be “defended” and protected. “Legitimized violence” and extrajudicial killings directed against “terrorists” are upheld in western democracies, as necessary instruments of national security. A “huma – nitarian war” is upheld by the so-called international community. It is not condemned as a criminal act. Its main architects are rewarded for their contributions to world peace.
America’s Mini-nukes
With regard to Iran, what is unfolding is the outright legitimization of war in the name of an illusive notion of global security. America’s mininukes, with an explosive capacity of up to six times a Hiroshima bomb, are upheld as a humanitarian bomb, whereas Iran’s nonexistent nuclear weapons are branded as an indisputable threat to global security.
When a US-sponsored nuclear war becomes an “instrument of peace”, condoned and accepted by the world’s institutions and the highest authority, including the United Nations, there is no turning back: human society has indelibly been precipitated headlong onto the path of self-destruction.
We are at a dangerous crossroads: the rules and guidelines governing the use of nuclear weapons have been “liberalized” (i.e. “deregulated” in relation to those prevailing during the Cold War era). The new doctrine states that Command, Control and Coordination (CCC) regarding the use of nuclear weapons should be “flexible”, allowing geographic combat commanders to decide if and when to use nuclear weapons:
“Geographic combat commanders would be in charge of Theater Nuclear Operations (TNO), with a mandate not only to implement but also to formulate command decisions pertaining to nuclear weapons.”[3]
We have reached a critical turning point in our history. It is absolutely essential that people across the land, nationally and internationally, understand the gravity of the present situation and act forcefully against their governments to reverse the tide of war.
The details of ongoing war preparations in relation to Iran and North Korea have been withheld from the public eye and the media is involved in acts of camouflage. The devastating impacts of a nuclear war are either trivialized or not mentioned. Instead, fake “crises” – e.g. a worldwide flu pandemic, a “false flag” nuclear attack by “Islamic terro rists” – are fabricated by the media, the governments, the intelligence apparatus and the Washington think tanks. While the real danger of nuclear war is barely acknowledged, these fake crises are invariably front page news.
A Third World War is no longer a hypothetical scenario. Already in 2007, President Bush hinted in no uncertain terms that if Iran did not comply with US demands, the US-NATO military might “reluctantly” be forced into in a World War III situation:
“We got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel. So I’ve told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon. I take the threat of Iran with a nuclear weapon very seriously...” (George W. Bush, 17 October 2007)
Notes
1. See interview with Mordechai Vanunu, Glob al Research, December 2005, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060102&articleId=1703.
2. Matthew Alford and Robbie Graham, “Lights, Camera, Covert Action: The Deep Politics of Hollywood”, Global Research, January 31, 2009, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11921.
3. Joint Chiefs of Staff, “Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations”, Joint Publication 3-12, Washington DC, March 2005, http://zfacts.com/metaPage/lib/zFacts_2005_03_15_Joint_Nuclear_Operations.pdf.
Order your pdf of this important book from Global Research here
E-Book Series No. 1.0
Global Research Publishers
Montreal, 2011. ISBN 978-0-9737147-3-9
76 pages (8.5×11)
Tables, color photographs, maps, text boxes.
Active hyperlinks to major references in the text, hyperlinked footnotes.
Spanish exclave tragedy
Interior Minister Jorge Fernández Díaz acknowledged on Thursday that Civil Guard officers fired their anti-riot weapons last week in Ceuta when hundreds of migrants charged a border crossing between the exclave and Morocco. But, the minister added, the civil guards used the amount of force which was “strictly necessary” to stop a desperate attempt to reach Spanish territory.
Twelve bodies have been recovered after many of the sub-Saharan migrants ran into the sea in an attempt to swim or wade around a seawall marking the border. As many as 15 are believed to have died in the crush.
Speaking in Congress, Fernández Díaz defended the security force’s actions, calling them “proportional,” and explaining that it was in response to “the belligerent behavior” of the migrants. However, he said the police used their weapons in a “dissuasive” manner, claiming that no one had been killed as a result of their response.
The tragedy took place on February 6, when about 300 people jumped into the water at the exclave’s crossing at Tarajal.
No migrant was hit by the rubber bullets that were fired by police, the minister said. In fact, he said, police had helped some two dozen migrants reach safety in the Spanish exclave.
The minister appeared before the congressional Interior Committee at his own behest, even though the Socialists, Izquierda Plural, Union, Progress and Democracy (UPyD) and Mixed Group parliamentarians had demanded explanations.
Civil Guard chief Arsenio Fernández de Mesa met with officers in Ceuta on Wednesday, and described their actions as “impecable".
Twelve bodies have been recovered after many of the sub-Saharan migrants ran into the sea in an attempt to swim or wade around a seawall marking the border. As many as 15 are believed to have died in the crush.
Speaking in Congress, Fernández Díaz defended the security force’s actions, calling them “proportional,” and explaining that it was in response to “the belligerent behavior” of the migrants. However, he said the police used their weapons in a “dissuasive” manner, claiming that no one had been killed as a result of their response.
The tragedy took place on February 6, when about 300 people jumped into the water at the exclave’s crossing at Tarajal.
No migrant was hit by the rubber bullets that were fired by police, the minister said. In fact, he said, police had helped some two dozen migrants reach safety in the Spanish exclave.
The minister appeared before the congressional Interior Committee at his own behest, even though the Socialists, Izquierda Plural, Union, Progress and Democracy (UPyD) and Mixed Group parliamentarians had demanded explanations.
Civil Guard chief Arsenio Fernández de Mesa met with officers in Ceuta on Wednesday, and described their actions as “impecable".
jueves, 13 de febrero de 2014
Facebook te mata
La policía española es muy eficiente en la detección de cierto tipo de delitos que se practican con utilización (malévola) de las llamadas redes sociales. Les comento un caso reciente.
Resulta que un sujeto, hombre y mayor de edad, invitaba a jóvenes a que le suministraran fotos suyas sexis o pornos. Supongo que, aparte de deleitarse en la contemplación del material gráfico gratuito, una vez provisto con los datos personales que los menores le facilitaban, pues el tipejo les amenazaba con colgar sus posturitas destapadas en la red. Para que no lo hiciera debían acceder a encuentros íntimos. Un chantaje burdo, vamos. Algunos implicados mordieron el anzuelo, por miedo o tal vez vergüenza. O puede que hasta les fuera el rollo, vaya a usted a saber. Pero otros denunciaron. Y al delincuente se le terminó el chollo.
La verdad es que nada de lo que sucede en la red es privado. Parafraseando, mal y pronto, la Biblia: "no hay nada oculto bajo el sol digital". Destaparse en cualquier portal de Internet tiene muchos riesgos, aparte de ser una ordinariez suprema. Intentar ligar, hacer amigos, relacionarse, pues erre que erre. Poner información personal sensible en manos de extraños/as es una profunda tontería. Desfogarse en Twitter, inconveniente. En tan pocas palabras se puede meter bastante la pata. Los servicios de e-mail tampoco son seguros.
Describo un caso de estupidez digital significativa. Resulta que a una mujer española se le ocurrió, ni más ni menos, que animar desde una red social a que, "alguien le pegara un tiro en la nuca a Rajoy" (actual presidente español). La tipa incluso anunció que se iba a "tatuar el careto" del perpetrador del asesinato. Pues, sí, la pillaron a la muy tonta. Y me alegro.
Tengo una única experiencia de información maliciosa recibida en mi correo. Me llegaron unas fotos de fetos. La tapadera era una supuesta ONG que realizaba una campaña anti-abortista. Sin dificultad logré determinar de dónde provenía la iniciativa. Lo que querían era dinero, claro. El cebo: combatir el aborto y ayudar a las madres. Informé a la policía española y me desentendí del asunto.
Facebook, como todo el mundo y su hermano pequeña debería saber, es ante todo una empresa próspera. Cotiza en bolsa. Su producto estrella, la materia prima, proviene de la millonaria información que sus usuarios cuelgan voluntariamente en el portal.
Si mi permiten el tuteo: tú eres la base de Facebook. Facebook pone un servicio global de procesamiento de datos. Los datos son su tesoro. Los suministra a los anunciantes. También los comparte, por ley, con la Administración estadounidense en circunstancias de presunta persecución de delitos.
Muchos usuarios de Internet experimentan como una necesidad vital el figurar en Facebook. Opino que tal mezcla de narcisimo y memez puede llegar a ser peligrosa. El artículo que viene a continuación no es original. Ni descubre nada. Se lo recomiendo a quienes están pensando "apuntarse" a Facebook. Lo prometo: hay cierta vida fuera de Facebook.
Tampoco es imprescindible soltar muchas tonterías en Blogger. Ojo con las alusiones a otras personas.
Uso Blogger pero sigo tres normas:
1) Pienso al menos media hora antes de darle a "Publicar". Y si luego releo y tengo que eliminar la entrada lo hago. No se pierde nada.
2) Doy la cara. Asumo la responsabilidad de lo que publico.
3) No uso Facebook. Que ellos hagan su trabajo.
"Este febrero, la mayor red social del globo, Facebook, cumplió diez años con más de 1 200 millones de usuarios activos e ingresos cercanos a los ocho mil millones de dólares.
La información personal que recopila de sus clientes y la publicidad que se genera con esos datos, es la principal fuente de ganancias de la red social más popular del mundo, según afirman los expertos.
Facebook lo sabe todo de sus usuarios: la edad, la ubicación, el estado civil, los estudios que han cursado, y también, gracias al botón "me gusta" (una función que permite al cliente seleccionar lo que le parece más interesante dentro de la red social), sus gustos y preferencias.
Pero además conoce otros datos menos obvios, y esta información la consigue a través de lo que las personas escriben en sus publicaciones, los contenidos que comparten e incluso las veces que pasan el cursor por encima de una imagen concreta.
La idea es muy sencilla. Quien conozca tu género preferido de lectura, tus películas y series favoritas, tu equipo de fútbol, tu tiempo de ocio durante el fin de semana, tiene un poder tremendo sobre ti, que o bien lo puede utilizar o vendérselo a un tercero.
"Saben más sobre tus gustos y preferencias que cualquier otra empresa de la historia", dijo Nate Elliott, analista de redes sociales de la firma de investigación Forrester.
Su principal objetivo es averiguar cómo hacer que sus clientes anunciantes se beneficien de esta información, y cómo hacerlo sin afectar directamente a su base de usuarios.
Además, para conseguir un registro de la actividad fuera de Facebook, la red social coopera con empresas de recolección de datos como búsquedas por Internet o compras con tarjetas de crédito para generar perfiles de cada persona o grupo de personas.
"Es una de las herramientas más potentes que tenemos", dijo citado por la CNN, Molly McCarty, que utiliza Facebook para publicar anuncios dedicados a sus clientes.
Todo este sistema está respaldado en un marco legal que los usuarios aceptan des-de el momento en que se inscriben de manera gratuita y permiten el uso de su información por parte de terceros.
Si bien Facebook, al ser la más grande, es un buen ejemplo de cómo funcionan en la actualidad las redes sociales, otras más pequeñas tienen mecanismos similares, como puede ser el caso de Twitter o Linkedin. También el gigante de las búsquedas, Google, vende o negocia con la información que posee en sus centros de datos.
De hecho, la venta directa del acceso al big data, como se le llama a los millones de gigabytes que están guardados en los servidores de las principales compañías de Internet, es un servicio cada vez más importante para otras empresas de la economía real que pueden ganar miles de millones de dólares con esa información.
Los especialistas coinciden en que el impacto de las redes sociales ha sido positivo en cuanto a interconectar a las personas. Sin embargo, a veces se olvida que Internet está inmersa también en la lógica del mercado y el capitalismo con formas mucho más sutiles y efectivas que las tradicionales.
Cada vez que un usuario sube una foto personal, le dedica un "me gusta" a una página en específico o simplemente comenta con el mundo cómo se siente ese día, puede estar echando a andar la caja registradora de una empresa al otro lado del planeta". (Con información de Granma Internacional)
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)